Why You Always Read About YCombinator Startups on TechCrunch

When you see a TechCrunch article about a YCombinator company, it's not there because the company is interesting or innovative (even though some of them genuinely are). No, it's there because of a butthappy relationship between Mike Arrington and Paul Graham.

A source close to TechCrunch tells me that there is a formal agreement between YCombinator and TechCrunch whereby every YCombinator startup will be featured on TC in exchange for the exclusive launch story. I have yet to uncover whether any money is changing hands, but it seems unlikely.

This alone isn't terribly damning, but it shows a pattern of behavior on both sides of the deal. It's always been clear that being featured on TechCrunch isn't a result of merit, so this is a nice validation of my little theory.

It's Not Cronyism When We Do It

I talked to a YCombinator founder about this who told me how he never knew about any formal arrangement, but, as a YC company, when you're ready to launch, you call Paul Graham and he makes shit happen. Mike Arrington fancies himself a king maker, and Paul Graham fancies himself a power broker, so this arrangement is the natural outcome.

This kind of shit is par for the course. The TechCrunch 50 Potemkin village was rigged. Arrington awarded the $50,000 prize to a Twitter clone that was a spin-off of a company founded by a good friend of Peter Thiel, who runs a VC firm that partially funded TechCrunch 50.

Return of the Mack – Watch My Flow

This marks the return of Uncov. There are a few other TechCrunch goings-on that I'm tracking, so as soon as I get some confirmation, you'll read about it here. If Arrington has pissed you off in any way, shape, or form, and you want to run your mouth off to Uncov about it, contact me. I guarantee your anonymity.

Comments

kingmakers and power brokers

Interestingly enough, Arrington hasn't made any kings and graham hasn't been around too many either. The defining feature of all companies which have had a ridiculous amount of popularity in the last 3 or 4 years is the lack of involvement by either of these 2 twats.

Too bad

You went and investigated this? Jesus, its the peons like you that care enough about the technopapparazi that explain why there are so many boring trolls on TC, who lambaste basically every featured startup, including the YC ones.

Go dig up some real news before you quit your day job.

Story?

TC: "Hey, tell us about your startups when they're ready to launch, we want to write about them on our popular website. We'd like to give you the best coverage, and we can do that the sooner you tell us about your launch."[implied: we want to break the story first, and we'll reward you with better coverage if we do]
YC: "OK"

YC startups tend to fit the archetypal pulp startup story: "young guys make something cool in hope of billions, American Dream is real." TechCrunch wants to publish interesting startup stories with minimum research. Why the outrage, or at least, why the surprise?

Because every start ups do

Because every start ups do not have the chance to be published on TC. Only the one which founder knows Arrington... or the one that Arrington knows (and likes).