The Convenience of Nondisclosure

As a journalist, it's much easier to leave your cronyism undisclosed. After all, if people found out that there motivations to your writing beyond truth or entertainment, then they might think less of you. Maybe they'd even stop advertising on your website.

There's always been a bit of conflict of interest within TechCrunch, and for the most part it is disclosed pretty well. Arrington is an investor in Seesmic... that sort of thing. But what about the conflicts you don't hear about? I told you all earlier about the relationship between YCombinator and TechCrunch, but that could be written off by skeptics, as I presented no hard proof beyond what a source told me.

This time, though, I have proof.

What's Webaroo?

Webaroo is a tech company. I'm not really sure what they do, but they've raised a lot of money to do it. That doesn't really matter. What matters is their coverage on TechCrunch.

Mike Arrington's rave review of Webaroo was published in April, 2006. In June of that year, Webaroo was "selected" as a top entry to the TechCrunch sponsored Supernova 12 event. Supernova 12 was like the TechCrunch 50 before there was a TechCrunch 50: a showcase for the "best" startups that applied. Later, in July of this year, TechCrunch wrote about Webaroo closing a funding round.

Well That's Nothing Out of the Ordinary

This is all well and good when they conveniently ignore the glaring cronyism. Webaroo was co-founded by a gentleman named Brad Husick. Brad Husick is the husband of one Gail Clayton Husick, a former partner at the law firm Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where Arrington used to work. Did they know eachother? Probably. They co-authored a book in 1998.

Husick's name is nowhere to be found on TechCrunch. The only place you'll find it is in a comment thread on one TC story. It's not listed in Webaroo's CrunchBase page. Husick seems to have since left Webaroo, as he is not listed on their management team page, but there are several articles on the internet that reference him as co-founder and President of the company.

Interestingly, the last post about Webaroo on TechCrunch, the one where their funding round was announced, stirred up a little controversy. It was posted by now former TechCrunch writer Calley Nye. After its publication, a "source" told TechCrunch that the funding had not yet closed, and the announcement was premature. This happened in July 2008. Two questions rise out of this: who was the source, and why did Calley Nye stop working for TechCrunch shortly after? Occam's Razor, indeed.

Anyway, as for the other startups cheated out of their chance to present at Supernova 12: sorry, guys. Your co-founder should have been married to one of Mike Arrington's friends, that makes it a lot easier.

If this relationship went undisclosed for so long, what else don't we know?

Comments

Proof? I don't need no stinkin' proof.

You don't need proof. Anyone who relies on TechCrunch for more than Britney twitter news isn't going to swayed by something as silly as proof. You should link back to other posts you've written that say the same thing. Do it often enough, loudly enough and eventually and people will believe.

waaaaahmbulance

you didn't even try to make this post funny, you're just crying about techcrunch cuz they hurt your butt

You should have read my article better

I remember writing this story quite vividly. While your version makes for a much better piece in your conspiracy puzzle, its not actually that interesting.

I even checked my email to see where I got the story from. It was a link in an email from someone at Pluggd.in, an tech news blog in India. I even mentioned it in the story.

And Occam's Razor is defined as "The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible." I'm sorry, but you're version is full of irrelevant assumptions.

Get a hobby.

this is my hobby

^^

This chick had a career in

This chick had a career in communications, and I've never seen any evidence that she communicates much better than a community college dropout. Read: every comment of hers on valleywag and now this one.

She never said HOW she got

She never said HOW she got her degree ;).

Calley Nye still doesn't get it

Ms. Nye's catty reply is typical and sad--at the same time.

Ms. Nye could have used this forum to clarify what role--if any--she played in all of this. Instead, she simply continues to shill for a person who has long since forgotten her.

Ms. Nye could have clarified whether she knew that Mr. Husick was a friend of Mr. Arrington. She did not.

Ms. Nye could have clarified whether she was in fact fired by Mr. Arrington because of the story. She did not.

Ms. Nye could have clarified whether Mr. Husick contacted Mr. Arrington to correct her error. She did not.

Perhaps she's too young and immature to understand she was used. Perhaps she's still hurt by it. Perhaps she doesn't even understand the big picture.

One thing we DO know about Ms. Nye. She continues to demonstrate poor judgment.

Who cares?

'nuff said.

Butthurt or trolling?

Hell, why not both?

It's evidence enough

that Michael Arrington is not an independent journalist. He has something to gain, always, by being the "judge" of who sails & who fails in the Valley. It's all a big racket.

Just look at who gets featured, talked about, and promoted on Techcrunch. If they don't seem like standouts in their categories, then ask yourself why they deserve so much good "unbiased" press. Then make the connections. I can guarantee you'll find more than enough shady dealings.

Good show.

Indeed. Glad to see you back bothering good genteel internet folk.

Regards,

David

missing word

> After all, if people found out that there motivations to your writing

I'm guessing there is a missing a word: "there _are_ motivations to your writing"

>>GET

> > After all, if people found out that there motivations to your writing
> I'm guessing there is a missing a word: "there _are_ motivations to your writing"

Surely it is supposed to read "After all, if people found _a mouse in the cupboard they would be upset_ "

Isn't this standard press practice?

I thought this was how all commercial media worked.