Have a tip?
Want to advertise?
Contact the editors:
Yahoo is firing a bunch of people to cut $400 million from its budget. That sucks for the people who work there, but the entrepreneurs and venture capitalists who hustled Yahoo out of more than $2.5 billion in the last 4 years probably aren't terribly concerned.
In the typical American fashion, Yahoo bought a bunch of shit it didn't need with money it didn't have. That, of course, was no problem at the time because the stock market always goes up, and they get a fuck-ton of airline miles every time they buy a Web 2.0 startup. In the other typical American fashion, the sharks took advantage of Yahoo's poor financial sense and engineered a little bit of the old redistribution of wealth, namely, distributing Yahoo's wealth across their pockets.
I love this country.
Oddpost - Because Gmail Is Hard
On April 1, 2004, Google launched the first beta of GMail. This was one time when the word revolutionary was actually appropriate, at least in the context of web-based e-mail. It didn't exactly solve world hunger, but it caused Yahoo to freak the fuck out and pay upwards of $30 million for a ten-man startup called Oddpost a couple months later. Oddpost became the new version of Yahoo Mail, and the world breathed a sigh of relief.
VerdiSoft - The Ghost In The Machine
VerdiSoft was a company that did something with mobile phone syncing. It's some way to sync your office shit to the numerous mobile gadgets you have because you have no interpersonal relationships and need to fill the void with material possessions. VerdiSoft never actually shipped a product, but Yahoo never believed products to be important. What is important, though, is spending $58 million on a startup you'll just roll into Yahoo Mobile.
Maven Networks - Still Trying To Make Online Video Profitable
Google realized that it was making the other publicly traded companies look bad, so in 2006, it bought YouTube as a solid loss-leader to even off its balance sheet. Still wanting to run with the big dogs, Yahoo pissed away $160 million on Maven Networks two years later. Maven does something with video platforms or some shit. Fantastic.
Yahoo spent billions more on other stuff, too. Funny, none of these "investments" prevented them from laying off their staff.
The goal of Web 2.0 was to get users first, then figure out how to make money off of them. Well, at least that's what you tell your investors. In reality, the goal is more like "get users, and hope to get acquired and become somebody else's problem". For Silicon Valley, this really is self-destructive behavior, with Yahoo being the enabling friend who brings us clean needles from his job as an orderly. Sure, he's not intervening like a true friend would, trying to get us into rehab, but he feels like he's helping because we're still disease-free.
Well, hospital administration just figured out that Yahoo has been raiding the supply cabinet. Looks like we're fucked now.
Comments
Oh my
Damn that was brutally honest.
Lawl
That last metaphor was shit. But the rest of the post made me smile.
Maybe men should lay off their wives, you know, to reduce budgets after all those acquisitions of furniture and clothes and shit. Yahoo is a good example.
Does Yahoo advertise in the mainstream media in the US? Years and years ago, they advertised on TV here in Australia - I lolled. Why are you advertising Internets on the TV? To respond to the ad, the viewer would have to get up off the couch (NOT GOING TO HAPPEN), order dial-up Internets tubes from the Yellow Pages (yes Yahoo advertised on the TV when only like 20% of Australia was hooked up to the tubes, and only had dial-up), then wait five hundred years to be connected, then fight with their buggy Windows 98, and FINALLY they get to type "porn" into Yahoo.com...
What do Silicon Valley start-ups and derivatives traders have in common? Neither actually produces anything! It's all paper and blue-sky. Nobody's making an actual profit because NOBODY'S MAKING ANYTHING WORTH PAYING FOR. With derivatives traders, they're just writing loans against money they borrowed so people can buy stocks from people who don't own them... with Web 2.0 they're using shareholders' funds to pay day-to-day expenses. In either case, there's no underlying "business".
It's enough to make you want to go into manufacturing.
Yaaahooooo!
P.S. Pressflip was a perfect example of a shit company with no business plan. Just in case nobody remembered to remind you this hour.
P.P.S. I just realised that if you search for "Pressflip" on Google, the first page is just you and Arrington.
you're a fucking moron
That last metaphor may be the high point of human expression. It's the best thing that's ever been said
Not the root of the problem
I don't think Yahoo's fate changed in any way when they decided to buy all those useless companies. Google has bought many companies which will generate losses in the foreseeable future. Even Youtube has not reached break-even yet despite of all efforts (IMO they will never be able to compensate their bandwidth cost by advertisement, but that's not the topic here).
I think Yahoo's acquisitions have only accelerated their downfall. The real problem is that their core business (web search) is inferior since around 2001. Yahoo's international market share has plummeted in the last years. In the US they are still relatively strong, but that's just evidence of their efforts to improve the engine results with manpower. If people don't use them anymore to search the web there is little use for all the technology and potential those former start-ups might add to the overall experience.
In other words Yahoo might die more quickly because they invested so much in useless stuff. Google on the other hand keeps growing despite of their investments and current losses since they are highly profitable in their core business. And even if services like Youtube stay unprofitable they might pay off by increasing the user base.
The first step is to build a search engine which provides the best search results. Then you can worry about fancy applications which users might enjoy along the way. Just don't do it the other way around.
Blue Lithium, Zimbra ....
You are forgetting Zimbra ($350 million, cash) and Blue Lithium ($200+ million, cash?). The Zimbra acquisition is to "strengthen" Yahoo Mail, which was already "strengthened" with OddPost for $30 million just 3 years earlier.
Zimbra has no fit I can discern for Yahoo, because it is an open source installable product that targets MS Exchange in businesses. Yahoo Mail has long shelved its business ambitions. Zimbra is a web mail system in the superficial sense that it has a web UI (slow as molasses). It is not easy to make Zimbra become a web service that serves 250 million users. The smartest thing the Zimbra guys ever did was to take it all in cash - one could almost hear the "Gotcha Sucker" cry from the VCs on that one! The Yahoo genius who did that deal (the peanut butter guy) has already bailed. Expect a write down on that one soon.
Blue Lithium is another advertising network - there are only about 5000 of them left, and Yahoo still has some cash left, so I suppose they all have hope.
oh man
i love your shit, keep it up, this can be monetized.
i would say some thing but rather keep my options with yahoo open